Legal immunity, a controversial legal doctrine, bestows individuals or entities immunity from civil or criminal responsibility. This safeguard can serve as a powerful tool in protecting those in positions of authority, but it also generates questions about justice. Opponents contend that legal immunity can insulate the powerful from accountability,

The concept of immunity is deeply complex. While it serves a vital role in protecting citizens from arbitrary prosecution, there are concerns that it can also be misused to exempt the guilty from accountability. This raises a critical question: does immunity, intended as a safeguard against injustice, ultimately become a shield against justice itse

The concept of immunity is deeply intriguing. While it serves a vital role in protecting persons from unwarranted prosecution, there are concerns that it can also be exploited to exempt the guilty from consequences. This raises a critical question: does immunity, intended as a safeguard against unfair treatment, ultimately become a shield against j

The concept of immunity is deeply fascinating. While it serves a vital role in protecting individuals from unwarranted prosecution, there are concerns that it can also be misused to shield the guilty from consequences. This raises a critical question: does immunity, designed as a safeguard against oppression, fundamentally become a shield against j

The concept of immunity is deeply complex. While it serves a vital role in protecting citizens from unwarranted prosecution, there are concerns that it can also be exploited to shield the guilty from consequences. This raises a critical question: does immunity, meant as a safeguard against injustice, fundamentally become a shield against justice it